Criminal Protective Orders in California Domestic Violence Cases

What they are, why they happen at arraignment, and how to protect yourself from accidental violations

A Criminal Protective Order (CPO) is a court order issued inside a criminal case (Superior Court). In domestic violence prosecutions, a CPO is typically imposed **immediately—at arraignment—**and it controls contact between the accused and the “protected person” while the case is pending.

In practical terms: the CPO is often the first major consequence of a DV arrest—sometimes before anyone has had time to think through housing, childcare, or work logistics.

CPO vs. DV Restraining Order (DVRO): Not the Same Thing

Criminal Protective Order (CPO) — Criminal Court

  • Issued by a criminal judge in the Superior Court criminal case
  • Often requested by the prosecution as a standard condition in all DV filings
  • Can be ordered even if the protected person does not want it
  • Enforced by police as a criminal order
  • Violations are charged as a new crime (can not “mutually agree” to ignore it)

Santa Clara County’s court self-help page describes the two basic CPO types (no contact vs. peaceful contact).

Domestic Violence Restraining Order (DVRO) — Family/Civil Court

  • A separate civil/family case (not the criminal case)
  • Usually requested by the protected person (petitioner)
  • Different procedures, different courtrooms, different paperwork and timelines
  • Can remain even if the criminal case ends (because it’s a separate case)

Secure online intake form

The Courtroom Reality: CPOs Are Issued in Almost Every DV Criminal Case at the Arraignment date

In DV prosecutions, it is extremely common for the court to issue a CPO at the arraignment date as a standard protective measure—even when:

  • the protected person asks the court not to issue it,
  • the couple is still living together,
  • there are kids and co-parenting requires communication,
  • the protected person wants contact.

That “but we both want contact” argument usually does not stop issuance at arraignment. The court’s default posture is safety-first and case-integrity-first. The judge can modify this if they find “good cause” to do so. A prepared attorney/client will show up with “good cause” in their file already.

Two Main Versions of a CPO

Santa Clara County’s court materials describe two broad categories: No Contact and Peaceful Contact.

1) No Contact CPO (the default in many DV arraignments)

No contact means no contact—period. Typically:

  • No calls, texts, emails, DMs, or social media contact
  • No “through a friend” messages
  • Often includes stay-away distances (home/work/school)

Critical point: Even if the protected person initiates contact, the restrained person can still be arrested/charged for responding. Consent does not override the order.

2) Peaceful Contact Order (less restrictive)

A peaceful contact order allows contact only if it stays peaceful—no harassment, threats, intimidation, or violence. This is only granted if the judge finds “good cause” to do so. Often it is used when:

  • the parties share children and need to communicate,
  • they intend to remain in the same home,
  • the protected person affirmatively supports contact.
  • the protected party proves they’ve taken an education course about their rights and protections

“We Live Together” Is Where People Get Burned

If a No Contact CPO issues and the parties are still living together, you immediately have a risk of:

  • someone being forced to leave on short notice,
  • accidental contact (same house, same driveway, same childcare handoff),
  • a new arrest for a violation that wasn’t “malicious,” just unavoidable.

And a CPO violation is not a slap-on-the-wrist situation—it can create a new criminal violation and make the underlying case harder to resolve.

Getting a Peaceful Contact Order: Victim Impact / Education Proof Is Often Required

In Santa Clara County DV cases, many judges commonly require some form of proof the protected person completed a victim-focused education class (often described in practice as a “Victim Impact” or DV-informed safety/education course) before they will consider converting a No Contact CPO to Peaceful Contact—especially early in the case.

These courses are aimed at:

  • understanding coercive control and the cycle of abuse,
  • safety planning,
  • reducing pressure/recantation dynamics,
  • helping the protected person make an informed request.

Important: Reach out to your attorney before the case begins–they can get you referred into an approved DV course that can have a serious impact on the case from the outset. “Approved” can mean different things depending on the judge and the context (criminal court vs. family court vs. probation). The safe move is to prepare documentation early and have counsel present it correctly.

Why Preparing Before Arraignment Matters

If you wait until arraignment to figure this out, you may get hit with an order that:

  • forces an immediate move-out,
  • blocks childcare coordination,
  • creates instant risk of “accidental” violations.

Preparing ahead of time helps ensure:

  • you don’t walk out of court into a violation situation,
  • housing/parenting logistics are ready,
  • the court has what it needs to consider a lesser order where appropriate.

Talk to a Lawyer Before You “Just Text Them Back”

If a CPO is in place, “we’re both okay with it” is not a defense to a violation. You need a plan—and often you need to move quickly, before arraignment.

Next Step

If you’re facing a potential criminal DV case and want to best prepare yourself for Court—you can send me your information here and I’ll email you back quickly.

Secure online intake form